Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-26 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:58:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hi all, > > I would propose merging the following patches... > > The first set is mostly from Jason and tweaks the mutex adaptive > spinning, AIM7 throughput numbers: > > PRE: 100 2000.04 21564.90 2721.29 311.99 3.12

Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-25 Thread Jason Low
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:58:20 +0100 Peter Zijlstra > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would propose merging the following patches... > > > > The first set is mostly from Jason and tweaks the mutex adaptive > > spinning, AIM7 throughput num

Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-11 Thread Waiman Long
On 02/11/2014 03:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:45:02AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: heh, yes, it's stupid how long many benchmarks take. Ditch it. A change like this should be testable with a 30-line microbenchmark which runs in 5 seconds tops. Another very nice option

Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-11 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:45:02AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > heh, yes, it's stupid how long many benchmarks take. Ditch it. A > > change like this should be testable with a 30-line microbenchmark > > which runs in 5 seconds tops. > > Another very nice option would be to stick the relevant

Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:17:00 +0100 Peter Zijlstra > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:02:30PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:58:20 +0100 Peter Zijlstra > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I would propose merging the f

Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:17:00 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:02:30PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:58:20 +0100 Peter Zijlstra > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would propose merging the following patches... > > > > > > The first set

Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-10 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:02:30PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:58:20 +0100 Peter Zijlstra > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would propose merging the following patches... > > > > The first set is mostly from Jason and tweaks the mutex adaptive > > spinning, AIM7 through

Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:58:20 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hi all, > > I would propose merging the following patches... > > The first set is mostly from Jason and tweaks the mutex adaptive > spinning, AIM7 throughput numbers: > > PRE: 100 2000.04 21564.90 2721.29 311.99 3.12 0.01

[PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches

2014-02-10 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Hi all, I would propose merging the following patches... The first set is mostly from Jason and tweaks the mutex adaptive spinning, AIM7 throughput numbers: PRE: 100 2000.04 21564.90 2721.29 311.99 3.12 0.01 0.00 99 POST: 100 2000.04 42603.85 5142.80 311.99 3.12