Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes

2012-10-01 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 10/01, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > This is on top of "[PATCH 0/3] uprobes: mprotect fixes" series, > > which is still waiting for review... > > > > Did you mean [PATCH 0/4] uprobes: remove is_swbp_at_addr() from > register/unregister? Yes, sorry for confusion, > I have already reviewed and

Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes

2012-10-01 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
> This is on top of "[PATCH 0/3] uprobes: mprotect fixes" series, > which is still waiting for review... > Did you mean [PATCH 0/4] uprobes: remove is_swbp_at_addr() from register/unregister? I have already reviewed and acked "[PATCH 0/3] uprobes: mprotect fixes" series". Got distracted by th

Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes

2012-09-30 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Forgot to mention, This is on top of "[PATCH 0/3] uprobes: mprotect fixes" series, which is still waiting for review... On 09/30, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Hello. > > Misc bugfixes, mostly register/unregister related. > > Note: 4/7 and especially 6/7 are the really ugly (but hopefully > temporary)

[PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes

2012-09-30 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Hello. Misc bugfixes, mostly register/unregister related. Note: 4/7 and especially 6/7 are the really ugly (but hopefully temporary) hacks. We already discussed this, we should inspect the original insn in uprobe_register(). But this is not easy, and we need something simple to fix (some of) the