Hi Guenter,
https://github.com/pantoniou/linux-beagle-track-mainline
Against tip of the mainline, topic branches against the master,
and a merge-branch every time I do one.
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Jun 29, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantel
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:46:24PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Yes there is an updated patchset against 3.10 as of this morning.
>
> I will post details how to get it later today.
>
Hi Pantelis,
looking forward to it. I see you have a large number of new branches in your
r
Hi Guenter,
Yes there is an updated patchset against 3.10 as of this morning.
I will post details how to get it later today.
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Jun 29, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> The following patchset int
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
> of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
>
> This patchset is against mainline as of Friday Jan 4 2013.
> (4956964 Merge tag 'driver-core-3.8-rc2' o
Our use case is partial reconfiguration of the FPGA. This will be
driven from userspace, so the bitstream to program the FPGA will come
from userspace, then the overlay for the DT, also from userspace.
So we want to take a compiled partial device tree and simply 'cat' it
to a point under /proc, s
Hi Alan,
On Feb 21, 2013, at 1:25 PM, delicious quinoa wrote:
> I like where this is heading. I'm interested in a use case where IP
> can be loaded into a FPGA, then add a blob to the device tree and load
> some drivers.
>
> I see your github tree. If I wanted to cherry-pick your code and play
I like where this is heading. I'm interested in a use case where IP
can be loaded into a FPGA, then add a blob to the device tree and load
some drivers.
I see your github tree. If I wanted to cherry-pick your code and play
around with it, which branch should I use? not-capebus-21?
Thanks,
Alan
On 01/05/2013 03:35:58 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:51AM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
>
> The problem being addressed is discussed in this thread:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1389017
Thanks for the link.
Since the motivation is already documente
Hi Richard,
It should, but there are a few differences in the syntax plus the fact that I
didn't write it.
It should go in by a separate patch by the original author.
Regards
-- Pantelis
Από το iPad μου
5 Ιαν 2013, 11:35 π.μ., ο/η Richard Cochran έγραψε:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:51A
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:16:51AM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
>
> The problem being addressed is discussed in this thread:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1389017
Thanks for the link.
Since the motivation is already documented in that post, why not add
it into Documentation/d
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Richard Cochran
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
>> of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
>
> It would be nice to know the mo
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
> of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
It would be nice to know the motivation for this code.
What is the use case? What problem or issue is bein
The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree.
This patchset is against mainline as of Friday Jan 4 2013.
(4956964 Merge tag 'driver-core-3.8-rc2' of \
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core)
13 matches
Mail list logo
