Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

2013-07-02 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:46:59AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So on the biggest system I've got; 4 nodes 32 cpus: > > Performance counter stats for './numa02' (5 runs): > > 3.10.0+ + patches - NO_NUMA 58.235353126 seconds time elapsed( +- > 0.45% ) > 3.10.0+ + patches -NUMA 17.

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

2013-07-02 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:24:22PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > * Mel Gorman [2013-06-26 15:37:59]: > > > It's several months overdue and everything was quiet after 3.8 came out > > but I recently had a chance to revisit automatic NUMA balancing for a few > > days. I looked at basic schedule

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

2013-07-01 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
* Mel Gorman [2013-07-01 09:43:21]: > > Thanks. Each of the the two runs had 5 iterations and there is a > difference in the reported average. Do you know what the standard > deviation is of the results? Yes, the results were from 2 different runs. I hadnt calculated the std deviation for thos

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

2013-07-01 Thread Mel Gorman
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:09:47AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > * Srikar Dronamraju [2013-06-28 19:24:22]: > > > * Mel Gorman [2013-06-26 15:37:59]: > > > > > It's several months overdue and everything was quiet after 3.8 came out > > > but I recently had a chance to revisit automatic NUMA

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

2013-06-30 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
* Srikar Dronamraju [2013-06-28 19:24:22]: > * Mel Gorman [2013-06-26 15:37:59]: > > > It's several months overdue and everything was quiet after 3.8 came out > > but I recently had a chance to revisit automatic NUMA balancing for a few > > days. I looked at basic scheduler integration resultin

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

2013-06-28 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
* Mel Gorman [2013-06-26 15:37:59]: > It's several months overdue and everything was quiet after 3.8 came out > but I recently had a chance to revisit automatic NUMA balancing for a few > days. I looked at basic scheduler integration resulting in the following > small series. Much of the followin

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

2013-06-27 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:37:59PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > It's several months overdue and everything was quiet after 3.8 came out > but I recently had a chance to revisit automatic NUMA balancing for a few > days. I looked at basic scheduler integration resulting in the following > small series

[PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing

2013-06-26 Thread Mel Gorman
It's several months overdue and everything was quiet after 3.8 came out but I recently had a chance to revisit automatic NUMA balancing for a few days. I looked at basic scheduler integration resulting in the following small series. Much of the following is heavily based on the numacore series whic