RE: [PATCH 0/5] xfs refcount conversions

2017-11-03 Thread Reshetova, Elena
> [I missed this followup, other stuff] > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:21:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:07:53PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > > IMO, that makes it way too hard to review san

Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs refcount conversions

2017-11-02 Thread Dave Chinner
[I missed this followup, other stuff] On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:21:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:07:53PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > IMO, that makes it way too hard to review sanely for code t

Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs refcount conversions

2017-10-23 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:21:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:07:53PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > Note: our previous thread didn't finish in any conclusion, so > > I am resending this now (rebased at latest linux-next) to revive > > the discussion. refcount_t is s

RE: [PATCH 0/5] xfs refcount conversions

2017-10-23 Thread Reshetova, Elena
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:07:53PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > Note: our previous thread didn't finish in any conclusion, so > > I am resending this now (rebased at latest linux-next) to revive > > the discussion. refcount_t is slowly becoming a standard for > > refcounters and we would rea

Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs refcount conversions

2017-10-20 Thread Dave Chinner
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:07:53PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > Note: our previous thread didn't finish in any conclusion, so > I am resending this now (rebased at latest linux-next) to revive > the discussion. refcount_t is slowly becoming a standard for > refcounters and we would really like t

[PATCH 0/5] xfs refcount conversions

2017-10-20 Thread Elena Reshetova
Note: our previous thread didn't finish in any conclusion, so I am resending this now (rebased at latest linux-next) to revive the discussion. refcount_t is slowly becoming a standard for refcounters and we would really like to make all conversions done where it is applicable. ** This series,