* Len Brown wrote:
> The return from idle path is latency sensitive,
> so the less code and fewer data accesses, the better.
>
> Remove the un-maintained i7300_idle driver,
> the only user of the x86 idle-notifier,
> and then remove the notifier itself.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar
Thanks,
The return from idle path is latency sensitive,
so the less code and fewer data accesses, the better.
Remove the un-maintained i7300_idle driver,
the only user of the x86 idle-notifier,
and then remove the notifier itself.
2 matches
Mail list logo
