Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support

Hi Will, On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:11:56AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Leo, > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:08:00PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Prompted by Leo's patches, here a series that corrects the arm64 perf > > > cap_u

Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support

Hi Leo, On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:08:00PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Prompted by Leo's patches, here a series that corrects the arm64 perf > > cap_user_time situation. > > I checked the latest mainline kernel code base, found this

Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support

Hi Peter, On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Prompted by Leo's patches, here a series that corrects the arm64 perf > cap_user_time situation. I checked the latest mainline kernel code base, found this patch set are missed to merge into it. Could you confirm if thi

[PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support

Prompted by Leo's patches, here a series that corrects the arm64 perf cap_user_time situation.