Re: [PATCH 0/5] Further sanitize INTEL_FAM6 naming

2019-08-23 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 01:53:12PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:23:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Lots of variation has crept in; time to collapse the lot again. > > Conceptually good. But I applied the series on top of tip/master > and got a build error: > > Loo

RE: [PATCH 0/5] Further sanitize INTEL_FAM6 naming

2019-08-22 Thread Luck, Tony
> Looks like your scripts didn't anticipate the CPP gymnastics like: > > #define VULNWL_INTEL(model, whitelist) \ >VULNWL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, whitelist) Also INTEL_CPU_FAM6() macro -Tony

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Further sanitize INTEL_FAM6 naming

2019-08-22 Thread Luck, Tony
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:23:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Lots of variation has crept in; time to collapse the lot again. Conceptually good. But I applied the series on top of tip/master and got a build error: CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.o arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1031:19: e

[PATCH 0/5] Further sanitize INTEL_FAM6 naming

2019-08-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Lots of variation has crept in; time to collapse the lot again.