Re: [PATCH 0/4] SS_AUTODISARM fixes and an ABI change

2016-05-03 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski wrote: > The first three are fixes IMO. The fourth changes the SS_AUTODISARM > bit. I'm assuming that's okay, as the bit has existed in -tip for > less than a day. Yeah, it's absolutely OK - I made it a standalone tree so we could even rebase it, but I think authorship and

[PATCH 0/4] SS_AUTODISARM fixes and an ABI change

2016-05-03 Thread Andy Lutomirski
The first three are fixes IMO. The fourth changes the SS_AUTODISARM bit. I'm assuming that's okay, as the bit has existed in -tip for less than a day. Andy Lutomirski (4): signals/sigaltstack: If SS_AUTODISARM, bypass on_sig_stack selftests/sigaltstack: Fix the sas test on old kernels sign