On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 09:32 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Richard Purdie wrote:
> > I think you were cc'd on some of it but you never commented. Anyhow,
> > I've reworked this patch series based on your comments. The hints were
> > appreciated, thanks. This was the way I'd originally hoped to be abl
Richard Purdie wrote:
No, not this way, I'm afraid. Sorry, I don't remember the prior
discussion on LKML, must have flooded past when my attention was
elsewhere.
I think you were cc'd on some of it but you never commented. Anyhow,
I've reworked this patch series based on your comments. The h
Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
as bad at which prevents reuse. It should hopefully be suitable for
testing in -mm.
Hugh Di
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
>
> Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
> to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
> as bad at which prevents reuse. It shoul
Improve the error handling when writes fail to a swap page.
Currently, the kernel will repeatedly retry the write which is unlikely
to ever succeed. Instead we allow the pages to be unused and then marked
as bad at which prevents reuse. It should hopefully be suitable for
testing in -mm.
These p
5 matches
Mail list logo
