Re: [PATCH 0/4] Bluetooth: hci_uart: various fixes

2016-08-30 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Boris, >>> We recently faced some problems when using an BT uart chip interfaced >>> through the H5 proto (rtk_h5). Here are the logs of the 2 different >>> issues we had when closing the line discipline (actually, restoring >>> the previous one) [1][2]. I know the kernel is Tainted in those lo

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Bluetooth: hci_uart: various fixes

2016-08-30 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Marcel, On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:48:13 -0700 Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Boris, > > > We recently faced some problems when using an BT uart chip interfaced > > through the H5 proto (rtk_h5). Here are the logs of the 2 different > > issues we had when closing the line discipline (actually, rest

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Bluetooth: hci_uart: various fixes

2016-08-30 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Boris, > We recently faced some problems when using an BT uart chip interfaced > through the H5 proto (rtk_h5). Here are the logs of the 2 different > issues we had when closing the line discipline (actually, restoring > the previous one) [1][2]. I know the kernel is Tainted in those logs, > bu

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Bluetooth: hci_uart: various fixes

2016-08-30 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:38:43 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi, > > We recently faced some problems when using an BT uart chip interfaced > through the H5 proto (rtk_h5). Here are the logs of the 2 different > issues we had when closing the line discipline (actually, restoring > the previous one

[PATCH 0/4] Bluetooth: hci_uart: various fixes

2016-08-19 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi, We recently faced some problems when using an BT uart chip interfaced through the H5 proto (rtk_h5). Here are the logs of the 2 different issues we had when closing the line discipline (actually, restoring the previous one) [1][2]. I know the kernel is Tainted in those logs, but after some inv