On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 00:49 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:51:17PM +,
> "Kani, Toshi" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 09:06 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:54:17PM -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > > Make PAT(Page Attribute Table)
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:49:20AM -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> In addition to Xen, KVM+qemu can enable/disable MTRR, PAT independently.
> So user may want to disable MTRR to reduce attack surface.
No, no "user may want" etc vague formulations. Just because some virt
thing "can" do stuff doesn't
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:51:17PM +,
"Kani, Toshi" wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 09:06 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:54:17PM -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > Make PAT(Page Attribute Table) independent from
> > > MTRR(Memory Type Range Register).
> > > Some e
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 09:06 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:54:17PM -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > Make PAT(Page Attribute Table) independent from
> > MTRR(Memory Type Range Register).
> > Some environments (mainly virtual ones) support only PAT, but not MTRR
> > becaus
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:54:17PM -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> Make PAT(Page Attribute Table) independent from
> MTRR(Memory Type Range Register).
> Some environments (mainly virtual ones) support only PAT, but not MTRR
> because PAT replaces MTRR.
> It's tricky and no gain to support both MTRR
Make PAT(Page Attribute Table) independent from
MTRR(Memory Type Range Register).
Some environments (mainly virtual ones) support only PAT, but not MTRR
because PAT replaces MTRR.
It's tricky and no gain to support both MTRR and PAT except compatibility.
So some VM technologies don't support MTRR,
6 matches
Mail list logo
