Re: [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes

2021-03-18 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:31:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hi, > > After more poking a new set of patches to fix static_call() vs __exit > functions. These patches replace the patch I posted yesterday: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/yfh6br61b5gk8...@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net > > Si

Re: [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes

2021-03-18 Thread Sumit Garg
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 17:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Hi, > > After more poking a new set of patches to fix static_call() vs __exit > functions. These patches replace the patch I posted yesterday: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/yfh6br61b5gk8...@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net > > Since I've rep

[PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes

2021-03-18 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Hi, After more poking a new set of patches to fix static_call() vs __exit functions. These patches replace the patch I posted yesterday: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/yfh6br61b5gk8...@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Since I've reproduced the problem locally, and these patches do seem to fully cure