On 11/08/2016 01:18 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Ok so no more dev on ION but can we add ION drivers like hisilicon does ?
>
If we can agree upon bindings, yes I think it would make sense
to have more platform support. Ideally, it would translate over
to newer features as well.
Thanks,
Laura
Ok so no more dev on ION but can we add ION drivers like hisilicon does ?
On 11/07/2016 02:17 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
Hello Laura,
What are plumbers outputs for ION after your talk ?
Regards,
Benjamin
We agreed to suspend work on new major Ion features and work
towards a more generic design being pushed by the graphics
team (see https://github.com/cubanismo/a
Hello Laura,
What are plumbers outputs for ION after your talk ?
Regards,
Benjamin
2016-10-27 1:25 GMT+02:00 Laura Abbott :
> On 10/26/2016 08:05 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>
>> 2016-10-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal :
>>>
>>> On 26 October 2016 at 20:11, Benjamin Gaignard
>>> wrote:
>
On 10/26/2016 08:05 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
2016-10-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal :
On 26 October 2016 at 20:11, Benjamin Gaignard
wrote:
2016-10-26 15:51 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal :
Hello Benjamin,
On 26 October 2016 at 19:02, Benjamin Gaignard
wrote:
It is more or less a copy of Hisi
2016-10-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal :
> On 26 October 2016 at 20:11, Benjamin Gaignard
> wrote:
>> 2016-10-26 15:51 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal :
>>> Hello Benjamin,
>>>
>>> On 26 October 2016 at 19:02, Benjamin Gaignard
>>> wrote:
It is more or less a copy of Hisilicon driver but with a heap
On 26 October 2016 at 20:11, Benjamin Gaignard
wrote:
> 2016-10-26 15:51 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal :
>> Hello Benjamin,
>>
>> On 26 October 2016 at 19:02, Benjamin Gaignard
>> wrote:
>>> It is more or less a copy of Hisilicon driver but with a heap definition
>>> fitting with STIH4xx SoC needs.
>>>
2016-10-26 15:51 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal :
> Hello Benjamin,
>
> On 26 October 2016 at 19:02, Benjamin Gaignard
> wrote:
>> It is more or less a copy of Hisilicon driver but with a heap definition
>> fitting with STIH4xx SoC needs.
>> I have just chnage the some function prefix from "hi6220" to "st
Hello Benjamin,
On 26 October 2016 at 19:02, Benjamin Gaignard
wrote:
> It is more or less a copy of Hisilicon driver but with a heap definition
> fitting with STIH4xx SoC needs.
> I have just chnage the some function prefix from "hi6220" to "sti".
>
Thanks for your patches!
I was just wondering
It is more or less a copy of Hisilicon driver but with a heap definition
fitting with STIH4xx SoC needs.
I have just chnage the some function prefix from "hi6220" to "sti".
Benjamin Gaignard (3):
add binding for STIh4xx ION driver
add STIH4xx ION driver
add STIH4xx ION driver in DT
.../dev
10 matches
Mail list logo
