Re: [PATCH 0/3] SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations

2017-05-11 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, On Friday, April 28, 2017 05:53:34 PM Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:00:37PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > From: Markus Elfring > > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:54:32 +0200 > > > > A few update suggestions were taken into account > > from static source code ana

Re: [PATCH 0/3] SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations

2017-04-28 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:00:37PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:54:32 +0200 > > A few update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. Hmmm, allocs -> callocs. Are these actually beneficial? If so, why?

[PATCH 0/3] SATA: Fine-tuning for two function implementations

2017-04-18 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:54:32 +0200 A few update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (3): Use kcalloc() in ahci_platform_get_resources() Use devm_kcalloc() in ahci_platform_get_resources() Use devm_kcalloc() in mv_plat