From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:24:23 +0200
> On 08/21/2017 05:06 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: David Daney
>> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:40:30 -0700
>>
>>> I suggest that the whole thing go via the BPF/net-next path as there
>>> are dependencies on code that is not yet merged
From: David Daney
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:40:30 -0700
> Here are several improvements and bug fixes for the MIPS eBPF JIT.
>
> The main change is the addition of support for JLT, JLE, JSLT and JSLE
> ops, that were recently added.
>
> Also fix WARN output when used with preemptable kernel, an
On 08/21/2017 05:06 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Daney
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:40:30 -0700
I suggest that the whole thing go via the BPF/net-next path as there
are dependencies on code that is not yet merged to Linus' tree.
What kind of dependency? On networking or MIPS changes?
From: David Daney
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:40:30 -0700
> I suggest that the whole thing go via the BPF/net-next path as there
> are dependencies on code that is not yet merged to Linus' tree.
What kind of dependency? On networking or MIPS changes?
If the dependency is on MIPS changes, then if
On 08/19/2017 01:40 AM, David Daney wrote:
Here are several improvements and bug fixes for the MIPS eBPF JIT.
The main change is the addition of support for JLT, JLE, JSLT and JSLE
ops, that were recently added.
Also fix WARN output when used with preemptable kernel, and a small
cleanup/optimiz
Here are several improvements and bug fixes for the MIPS eBPF JIT.
The main change is the addition of support for JLT, JLE, JSLT and JSLE
ops, that were recently added.
Also fix WARN output when used with preemptable kernel, and a small
cleanup/optimization in the use of BPF_OP(insn->code).
I su
6 matches
Mail list logo