Re: [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5

2007-03-17 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:22:45 + Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Following this email are three patches which represent the >> current state of the lumpy reclaim patches; collectively lumpy V5. > > So where do we stand with this now?Does it make anythin

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5

2007-03-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:22:45 + Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Following this email are three patches which represent the > current state of the lumpy reclaim patches; collectively lumpy V5. So where do we stand with this now?Does it make anything get better? I (continue to)

[PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5

2007-03-12 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Following this email are three patches which represent the current state of the lumpy reclaim patches; collectively lumpy V5. This patch kit is against 2.6.21-rc3-mm2. This stack is split out to show the incremental changes in this version. This contains one fixup following on from Christoph Lame