Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

2007-11-01 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Huang, Ying wrote: From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The "EFI boot" patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection: the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24. Should I change this and resend the patchset? O

RE: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

2007-11-01 Thread Huang, Ying
>From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >The "EFI boot" patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection: >the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one >probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24. Should I change this and resend the patchset? Or you modify it be

RE: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

2007-11-01 Thread Huang, Ying
>From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800 >"Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been >> in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be >> merged into 2.6.24

Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

2007-10-31 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Andrew Morton wrote: I stopped paying attention, sorry. Have all the outstanding issues been addressed? The "EFI boot" patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection: the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24. Othe

Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

2007-10-31 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:21:41 +0800 "Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been > in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be > merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not > me

Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

2007-10-30 Thread Huang, Ying
Can this patchset be merged into mainline kernel? This patchset has been in -mm tree from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 on. Andrew Moton has suggested it to be merged into 2.6.24 during early merge window of 2.6.24. It was not merged into mainline because the 32-bit boot protocol has not been done. But now, the

[PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

2007-10-24 Thread Huang, Ying
This patch set has been dropped because the 32-bit boot protocol is not ready. Now, the 32-bit boot protocol has been merged, so I resend this patch set. Can this patch set and 32-bit boot protocol document patch catch up with the merge window of 2.6.24? Following sets of patches add EFI/UEFI (U