Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support compiling out the prctl syscall

2016-11-08 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:26:53AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 4:17:47 PM CET Josh Triplett wrote: > > Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving some space. > > > > This also avoids regular increases in tinyconfig size as people add more > > non-

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support compiling out the prctl syscall

2016-11-08 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving some space. > > This also avoids regular increases in tinyconfig size as people add more > non-optional functionality to prctl (observed via the 0-day kernel > infrastructure). > > The first

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support compiling out the prctl syscall

2016-11-08 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 4:17:47 PM CET Josh Triplett wrote: > Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving some space. > > This also avoids regular increases in tinyconfig size as people add more > non-optional functionality to prctl (observed via the 0-day kernel > infrastr

[PATCH 0/2] Support compiling out the prctl syscall

2016-11-08 Thread Josh Triplett
Some embedded systems can do without the prctl syscall, saving some space. This also avoids regular increases in tinyconfig size as people add more non-optional functionality to prctl (observed via the 0-day kernel infrastructure). The first patch moves prctl and all its helpers into a separate s