On 16 February 2017 at 04:34, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Hi Ard, Rafael
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 05:44:28 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> Hello Bhupesh,
>>>
>>> On 15 February 2017 at 13:04, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>> > This patchs
Hi Ard, Rafael
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 05:44:28 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Hello Bhupesh,
>>
>> On 15 February 2017 at 13:04, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>> > This patchset presents a RFC approach to move the ACPI BGRT table
>> > han
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 05:44:28 PM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hello Bhupesh,
>
> On 15 February 2017 at 13:04, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > This patchset presents a RFC approach to move the ACPI BGRT table
> > handling related code out of 'arch/x86' and place it inside
> > 'drivers/firmware/ef
Hello Bhupesh,
On 15 February 2017 at 13:04, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> This patchset presents a RFC approach to move the ACPI BGRT table
> handling related code out of 'arch/x86' and place it inside
> 'drivers/firmware/efi' so that it can be used to support
> ACPI BGRT table and BGRT logo across x8
This patchset presents a RFC approach to move the ACPI BGRT table
handling related code out of 'arch/x86' and place it inside
'drivers/firmware/efi' so that it can be used to support
ACPI BGRT table and BGRT logo across x86 and AARCH64 ARCHs.
Note that this patchset is primarily tested on Qemu VM
5 matches
Mail list logo