Re: Markers: multi-probe locking fun (was: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II)

2008-02-19 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Paul E. McKenney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:33:26PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > * Jan Kiszka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > >> K. Prasad wrote: > > > >>> Hi Ing

Re: Markers: multi-probe locking fun (was: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II)

2008-02-19 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:03:18PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Paul E. McKenney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:27:40PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > >> K. Prasad wro

Re: Markers: multi-probe locking fun (was: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II)

2008-02-19 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:33:26PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Jan Kiszka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > >> K. Prasad wrote: > > >>> Hi Ingo, > > >>> Please accept these patches into the rt

Re: Markers: multi-probe locking fun (was: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II)

2008-02-19 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Paul E. McKenney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:27:40PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > >> K. Prasad wrote: > > >>> Hi Ingo, > > >>> Please accept these patches into the rt

Re: Markers: multi-probe locking fun (was: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II)

2008-02-19 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:27:40PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> K. Prasad wrote: > >>> Hi Ingo, > >>> Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the > >>> existing RCU tracing mechanism for

Re: Markers: multi-probe locking fun (was: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II)

2008-02-19 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Jan Kiszka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> K. Prasad wrote: > >>> Hi Ingo, > >>> Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the > >>> existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU

Markers: multi-probe locking fun (was: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II)

2008-02-19 Thread Jan Kiszka
Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> K. Prasad wrote: >>> Hi Ingo, >>> Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the >>> existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into >>> markers. >>> >>> These patches ar

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II

2008-02-18 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Paul E. McKenney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > K. Prasad wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, > > > Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the > > > existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into > > > marker

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II

2008-02-18 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:47:31PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > K. Prasad wrote: > > Hi Ingo, > > Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the > > existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into > > markers. > > > > These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc5

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II

2008-02-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
K. Prasad wrote: > Hi Ingo, > Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the > existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into > markers. > > These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc5-rt1 kernel tree. > > Along with marker transition, the RCU Tracing in

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II

2008-02-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
K. Prasad wrote: > Hi Ingo, > Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the > existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into > markers. > > These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc5-rt1 kernel tree. > > Along with marker transition, the RCU Tracing in

[PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing - Ver II

2008-01-07 Thread K. Prasad
Hi Ingo, Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into markers. These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc5-rt1 kernel tree. Along with marker transition, the RCU Tracing infrastructure has also been modu

[PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing

2007-12-30 Thread K. Prasad
Hi Ingo, Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into markers. These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc5-rt1 kernel tree. Along with marker transition, the RCU Tracing infrastructure has also been modu

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing

2007-11-30 Thread K. Prasad
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:36:05PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:11:28AM +0530, K. Prasad wrote: > > Hi, > > Please review the ensuing set of patches which convert the > > existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into > > markers. > > > > These

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing

2007-11-29 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:11:28AM +0530, K. Prasad wrote: > Hi, > Please review the ensuing set of patches which convert the > existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into > markers. > > These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc2-rt1 kernel tree. > > Along with marker

[PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing

2007-11-29 Thread K. Prasad
Hi, Please review the ensuing set of patches which convert the existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into markers. These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc2-rt1 kernel tree. Along with marker transition, the RCU Tracing infrastructure has also been modularised to

[PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing

2007-11-29 Thread K. Prasad
Hi, Please review the ensuing set of patches which convert the existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into markers. These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc2-rt1 kernel tree. Along with marker transition, the RCU Tracing infrastructure has also been modularised to