On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 16:21 -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:19:50AM -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> > > On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> > > > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers a
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:19:50AM -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> > On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> > > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely
> > > hence can not be accessed by applic
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely
> > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip the
> > bam_init
> > for any su
On 2016-03-22 15:25, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed
remotely
hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip
the bam_init
for any such platform if DT property is set.
On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely
> hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip the
> bam_init
> for any such platform if DT property is set.
>
> Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is
On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely
hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip the
bam_init
for any such platform if DT property is set.
Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C boards.
Tested with i2c DMA
6 matches
Mail list logo
