On Monday 07 January 2008 04:33:53 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2007 9:54 PM, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My only question is whether we should go further and vpu-ify routines
> > like lgread and kill_guest, so that we can avoid more "lg" temporary
> > variable
On Dec 25, 2007 9:54 PM, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 21 December 2007 00:33:40 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> > this patch makes room for the vcpu structure in lguest, already used in
> > this very same way at lguest64. It's the first part of our plan to
> > have lguest
On Friday 21 December 2007 00:33:40 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> this patch makes room for the vcpu structure in lguest, already used in
> this very same way at lguest64. It's the first part of our plan to
> have lguest and lguest64 unified too.
Hi Glauber!
These patches look really sol
this patch makes room for the vcpu structure in lguest, already used in
this very same way at lguest64. It's the first part of our plan to
have lguest and lguest64 unified too.
When two dogs hang out, you don't have new puppies right in the other day.
Some time has to be elapsed. They have to gro
4 matches
Mail list logo
