Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-31 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 06:35:18PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > You're right. I forgot that serio isn't anymore tied to the driver and > > can cease to exist on its own asynchronously. However, I'm still not > > sure whether it's worth it. We might as well simply drop the unregister > > call

Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-30 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Thursday 27 January 2005 17:16, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:18:55PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:36:05 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > > > > OK.

Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-29 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:18:55PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:36:05 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > > OK. I'll go through them, and apply as appropriate. I still need to wrap >

Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-28 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:13:12AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thursday 27 January 2005 11:15, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > I think that the very first path ("while true; do xset led 3; xset > > > -led 3; done" makes keyboard miss release events and makes it > > > unusable) should go in 2.6.1

Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-27 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Thursday 27 January 2005 11:15, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > I think that the very first path ("while true; do xset led 3; xset > > -led 3; done" makes keyboard miss release events and makes it > > unusable) should go in 2.6.11 so please do: > > > >         bk pull bk://dtor.bkbits.net/for-2.6.11

Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-27 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:36:05 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > OK. I'll go through them, and apply as appropriate. I still need to wrap > > my mind around the start() and stop() methods and see the necessity. I

Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-27 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > OK. I'll go through them, and apply as appropriate. I still need to wrap > my mind around the start() and stop() methods and see the necessity. I > still think a variable in the serio struct, only accessed by the serio.c > core driv

Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-27 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:04:06AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Vojtech, > > I have dropped the patches that have already been applied and > re-diffed the remaining patches. I have also merged Adrian's global -> > static cleanup and 2 patches from Prarit Bhargava (one re: releasing > resources

Re: [PATCH 0/16] New set of input patches

2005-01-27 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Vojtech, I have dropped the patches that have already been applied and re-diffed the remaining patches. I have also merged Adrian's global -> static cleanup and 2 patches from Prarit Bhargava (one re: releasing resources acquired by i8042_platform_init if controller initialization fails and the ot