Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security

2005-08-22 Thread serue
Quoting Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > You want to build these modules always and always modular? > > > > No matter whether the security subsystem is built modular or static? > > > > No matter whether the user has enabled or completely disabled th

Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security

2005-08-22 Thread Chris Wright
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > You want to build these modules always and always modular? > > No matter whether the security subsystem is built modular or static? > > No matter whether the user has enabled or completely disabled the > security subsystem? The modules are just for tes

Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security

2005-08-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:52:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > This patch adds two stackable test LSMs which only define > > inode_init_security(). Any file created while these modules are > > loaded should have the xattrs ("security.name1",

Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security

2005-08-22 Thread serue
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > This patch adds two stackable test LSMs which only define > inode_init_security(). Any file created while these modules are > loaded should have the xattrs ("security.name1", "value1") and > ("security.name2", "value2"). > > thanks, > -serge I'd f

Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security

2005-08-22 Thread serue
This patch adds two stackable test LSMs which only define inode_init_security(). Any file created while these modules are loaded should have the xattrs ("security.name1", "value1") and ("security.name2", "value2"). thanks, -serge Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- testinitsec1.c