On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:29:52PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:41:12PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > @@ -399,28 +399,24 @@ static inline struct page *read_mapping_page(struct
> > address_space *mapping,
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * Get the offset in PAGE_SIZE.
>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:41:12PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> @@ -399,28 +399,24 @@ static inline struct page *read_mapping_page(struct
> address_space *mapping,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Get the offset in PAGE_SIZE.
> + * Return the 4kB page offset of the given page.
> * (TODO: hugepage should
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:39:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:41:12 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
> wrote:
>
> > There is a complaint about duplication around the fundamental routines
> > of page index/offset getters.
> >
> > page_(index|offset) and page_file_(index|offset) pr
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:41:12 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
wrote:
> There is a complaint about duplication around the fundamental routines
> of page index/offset getters.
>
> page_(index|offset) and page_file_(index|offset) provide the same
> functionality, so we can merge them as page_(index|offset),
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:39:23PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:30:57 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
> wrote:
>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] rmap: fix pgoff calculation to handle hugepage correctly
> >
> > I triggered VM_BUG_ON() in vma_address() when I try to migrate an anonymous
> >
5 matches
Mail list logo