Re: [PATCH -mm] kprobes: kretprobe user entry-handler (updated)

2008-01-29 Thread Jim Keniston
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 23:52 +0530, Abhishek Sagar wrote: > This is a repost of a patch which was reviewed earlier at: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/58 (thanks to Jim Keniston and Srinivasa for > their review comments). This provides support to add an optional user defined > callback to be run

Re: [PATCH -mm] kprobes: kretprobe user entry-handler (updated)

2008-01-28 Thread Andy Whitcroft
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:32:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:52:48 +0530 Abhishek Sagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is a repost of a patch which was reviewed earlier at: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/58 (thanks to Jim Keniston and Srinivasa > > for their

Re: [PATCH -mm] kprobes: kretprobe user entry-handler (updated)

2008-01-28 Thread Abhishek Sagar
On 1/28/08, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neither the changelog nor the newly-added documentation explain why Linux > needs this feature. What will it be used for?? There's a detailed discussion along with an example on this thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/58 and a bit on: h

Re: [PATCH -mm] kprobes: kretprobe user entry-handler (updated)

2008-01-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:52:48 +0530 Abhishek Sagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a repost of a patch which was reviewed earlier at: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/58 (thanks to Jim Keniston and Srinivasa for > their review comments). This provides support to add an optional user defined

[PATCH -mm] kprobes: kretprobe user entry-handler (updated)

2008-01-26 Thread Abhishek Sagar
This is a repost of a patch which was reviewed earlier at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/58 (thanks to Jim Keniston and Srinivasa for their review comments). This provides support to add an optional user defined callback to be run at function entry of a kretprobe'd function. It also modifies t