Re: [PATCH]iommu-iotlb-flushing

2008-02-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:28:51 -0800 mark gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > + /*just flush them all*/ > > > > I'm surprised that checkpatch didn't grump about the odd commenting style. > > It didn't. What's odd about the comment style here? We normally put a space after "/*" and before "*/"

Re: [PATCH]iommu-iotlb-flushing

2008-02-25 Thread mark gross
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:05:17AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:06:23 -0800 mark gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The following patch is for batching up the flushing of the IOTLB for > > the DMAR implementation found in the Intel VT-d hardware. It works by > > buildi

Re: [PATCH]iommu-iotlb-flushing

2008-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:06:23 -0800 mark gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following patch is for batching up the flushing of the IOTLB for > the DMAR implementation found in the Intel VT-d hardware. It works by > building a list of to be flushed IOTLB entries and a bitmap list of > which DMA

[PATCH]iommu-iotlb-flushing

2008-02-20 Thread mark gross
The following patch is for batching up the flushing of the IOTLB for the DMAR implementation found in the Intel VT-d hardware. It works by building a list of to be flushed IOTLB entries and a bitmap list of which DMAR engine they are from. After either a high water mark (250 accessible via debugf