On 2/25/2013 12:00 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 25/02/13 17:49, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:12:52PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 15/02/13 19:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Should be backported to 3.8 stable.
Lets do one thing at a time.
The patch I have in
On 25/02/13 17:49, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:12:52PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On 15/02/13 19:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Should be backported to 3.8 stable.
>>>
>>> Lets do one thing at a time.
>>>
>>> The patch I have in the tree (and that I've ask
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:12:52PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 15/02/13 19:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> Should be backported to 3.8 stable.
> >
> > Lets do one thing at a time.
> >
> > The patch I have in the tree (and that I've asked Jens to pull for 3.9 - so
> > he might have al
On 15/02/13 19:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Should be backported to 3.8 stable.
>
> Lets do one thing at a time.
>
> The patch I have in the tree (and that I've asked Jens to pull for 3.9 - so
> he might have already in his tree) is the old hybrid where we still use llist
> but change the
> Should be backported to 3.8 stable.
Lets do one thing at a time.
The patch I have in the tree (and that I've asked Jens to pull for 3.9 - so
he might have already in his tree) is the old hybrid where we still use llist
but change the loop from 'for' to 'while'.
This is the stable/for-jens-3.8
Replace the use of llist with list.
llist_for_each_entry_safe can trigger a bug in GCC 4.1, so it's best
to remove it and use a doubly linked list, which is used extensively
in the kernel already.
Specifically this bug can be triggered by hot-unplugging a disk,
either by doing xm block-detach or
6 matches
Mail list logo
