ject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: tmem: selfballooning should be enabled
> when xen tmem is enabled
>>
>> >>> On 20.11.12 at 23:42, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>> > Konrad: Any chance this can get in for the upcoming window?
>> > (Or is it enough of a bug fix that it
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:21 AM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xen.org; Konrad Wilk; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: tmem: selfballooning should be enabled
> when x
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 7:48 PM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; xen-de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: tmem: selfballooning should be enabled when xen
> tmem is enabled
>
> On Tue, Nov 20,
>>> On 20.11.12 at 23:42, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Konrad: Any chance this can get in for the upcoming window?
> (Or is it enough of a bug fix that it can go in at an -rcN?)
>
> It was just pointed out to me that some kernels have
> cleancache and frontswap and xen_tmem enabled but NOT
> xen_self
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:42:18PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Konrad: Any chance this can get in for the upcoming window?
> (Or is it enough of a bug fix that it can go in at an -rcN?)
Lets do it in the next merge window. About now I am comfortable
only with regression fixes.
>
> It was just
Konrad: Any chance this can get in for the upcoming window?
(Or is it enough of a bug fix that it can go in at an -rcN?)
It was just pointed out to me that some kernels have
cleancache and frontswap and xen_tmem enabled but NOT
xen_selfballooning! While this configuration should be
possible, near
6 matches
Mail list logo
