On 06/01/2015 05:45 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 06/01/2015 04:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 05/29/2015 03:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Test a couple of special cases in 32
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 04:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 05/29/2015 03:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Test a couple of special cases in 32-bit kernels for entries from
vm86 mode. This w
On 06/01/2015 04:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 05/29/2015 03:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> Test a couple of special cases in 32-bit kernels for entries from
>>> vm86 mode. This will OOPS both old kernels due to a bug and and
>>> 4.1-rc
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 05/29/2015 03:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Test a couple of special cases in 32-bit kernels for entries from
>> vm86 mode. This will OOPS both old kernels due to a bug and and
>> 4.1-rc5 due to a regression I introduced, and it should mak
On 05/29/2015 03:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Test a couple of special cases in 32-bit kernels for entries from
> vm86 mode. This will OOPS both old kernels due to a bug and and
> 4.1-rc5 due to a regression I introduced, and it should make sure
> that the SYSENTER-from-vm86-mode hack in the ke
Test a couple of special cases in 32-bit kernels for entries from
vm86 mode. This will OOPS both old kernels due to a bug and and
4.1-rc5 due to a regression I introduced, and it should make sure
that the SYSENTER-from-vm86-mode hack in the kernel keeps working.
Tests: 394838c96013 x86/asm/entry/
6 matches
Mail list logo