On Friday 09 September 2005 10:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >The UNWIND_INFO part has still some problems - in particular it is
>
> lying
>
> >on all other architectures which don't check it yet. I made it
>
> dependent
>
> >on X86_64 right now.
>
> I don't think so. First, the i386 patch also adds the
>The UNWIND_INFO part has still some problems - in particular it is
lying
>on all other architectures which don't check it yet. I made it
dependent
>on X86_64 right now.
I don't think so. First, the i386 patch also adds the same (as I
indicated), and second this controls also the
-fasynchronous-ex
On Thursday 08 September 2005 17:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get
> line wrapped.)
>
> Being the foundation for reliable stack unwinding, this fixes CFI
> unwind
> annotations in many low-level x86_64 routines, plus a config option
> (
(Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get
line wrapped.)
Being the foundation for reliable stack unwinding, this fixes CFI
unwind
annotations in many low-level x86_64 routines, plus a config option
(available to all architectures, and also present in the previously
se
4 matches
Mail list logo
