Re: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH

* Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.12.07 14:42 >>> > > > >* Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> The patch introducing this left out x86-64, despite it also having > >> extra entries. > > > >thanks, applied. Is there any 2.6.24 urgency fo

Re: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH

>>> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.12.07 14:42 >>> > >* Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The patch introducing this left out x86-64, despite it also having >> extra entries. > >thanks, applied. Is there any 2.6.24 urgency for this? While I haven't seen x86-64 to break due to this (

Re: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH

* Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The patch introducing this left out x86-64, despite it also having > extra entries. thanks, applied. Is there any 2.6.24 urgency for this? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

[PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH

The patch introducing this left out x86-64, despite it also having extra entries. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-x86/system_64.h |6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) --- linux-2.6.24-rc4/include/asm-x86/system_64.h