On 2014/3/7 10:21, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 10:08 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>
>> The Power Management Controller (PMC) controls many of the power
>> management features present in the SoC. This driver provides
>> interface to configure the Power Management Controller (PMC).
>
> M
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 10:08 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> The Power Management Controller (PMC) controls many of the power
> management features present in the SoC. This driver provides
> interface to configure the Power Management Controller (PMC).
More trivial notes.
Nothing really that should st
On 2014/3/7 8:41, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 08:26 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>
>> my patch is word wrapped while I was not aware, hope this one work.
>
> trivial notes:
>
Thanks for your comments, Joe. Patch refined as below:
-Aubrey
[PATCH] X86 platform: New Intel Atom SOC powe
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 08:26 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> my patch is word wrapped while I was not aware, hope this one work.
trivial notes:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_atom.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pmc_atom.h
[]
> +#define BIT_LPSS1_F0_DMA(1 << 0)
> +#define BIT_LPSS1
On 2014/3/7 0:30, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 09:58 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>>
>>> What we absolutely don't want to happen is someone starting to use these
>>> unstable interfaces for something other than debugging. If debugfs ever
>>> needs to be mounted in a system for full functionalit
On 03/05/2014 09:58 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>
>> What we absolutely don't want to happen is someone starting to use these
>> unstable interfaces for something other than debugging. If debugfs ever
>> needs to be mounted in a system for full functionality, that is a bug.
>
> Understood. But we don'
On 2014/3/6 13:52, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 09:33 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>
>> These interfaces are uncommitted and don't have consumers now, I'd like
>> to keep them unstable in debugfs.
>>
>> We can change it if we received a requirement to use them later.
>>
>
> What we absolutely d
On 03/05/2014 09:33 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>
> These interfaces are uncommitted and don't have consumers now, I'd like
> to keep them unstable in debugfs.
>
> We can change it if we received a requirement to use them later.
>
What we absolutely don't want to happen is someone starting to use the
On 2014/3/6 13:28, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 09:21 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the reason for putting this in debugfs?
>>
>> S0ix support on Atom SoC needs all of the devices under south complex to
>> be quiesced, as well as the devices under north complex. This interface
>> s
On 03/05/2014 09:21 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>
>> What is the reason for putting this in debugfs?
>
> S0ix support on Atom SoC needs all of the devices under south complex to
> be quiesced, as well as the devices under north complex. This interface
> shows all of the devices states under platform co
On 2014/3/6 11:49, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 07:31 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> The Power Management Controller (PMC) controls many of the power
>> management features present in the SoC. This driver provides
>> interface to configure the Power Management Controller (PMC).
>>
>> This driver
On 03/05/2014 07:31 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> The Power Management Controller (PMC) controls many of the power
> management features present in the SoC. This driver provides
> interface to configure the Power Management Controller (PMC).
>
> This driver exposes PMC device state and sleep state resid
The Power Management Controller (PMC) controls many of the power
management features present in the SoC. This driver provides
interface to configure the Power Management Controller (PMC).
This driver exposes PMC device state and sleep state residency
via debugfs for observation:
/sys/kerne
13 matches
Mail list logo
