Re: [PATCH] x86: little fix in 'include/asm-x86/topology.h'

2008-01-05 Thread Miguel Botón
On Saturday 05 January 2008 16:09:44 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Before 'topology_32.h' and 'topology_64.h' were unified, topology > > defines in a X86_64 kernel were declared if CONFIG_SMP was enabled. > > Now, post unification, these same defines in a X86_64

Re: [PATCH] x86: little fix in 'include/asm-x86/topology.h'

2008-01-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Miguel Botón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Before 'topology_32.h' and 'topology_64.h' were unified, topology > defines in a X86_64 kernel were declared if CONFIG_SMP was enabled. > Now, post unification, these same defines in a X86_64 kernel are only > being declared if CONFIG_NUMA and CONFIG

[PATCH] x86: little fix in 'include/asm-x86/topology.h'

2008-01-04 Thread Miguel Botón
Before 'topology_32.h' and 'topology_64.h' were unified, topology defines in a X86_64 kernel were declared if CONFIG_SMP was enabled. Now, post unification, these same defines in a X86_64 kernel are only being declared if CONFIG_NUMA and CONFIG_SMP are enabled. This, for example, breaks 'perfmon_a