Hi Jiang,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:51:26PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu
Thanks for your review.
> Actually there's another racing pattern.
> for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++) {
> desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> access desc->xxx
> }
>
> When sparsing IRQ is enable
From: Joerg Roedel
> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:33:33 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: irq: Check for valid irq descriptor in
> check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable
>
> When an interrupt is migrated away from a cpu it will stay
> in its vector_irq array until smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt
make sense, please
let me know.
Constructive comments and feedback welcome.
Thanks,
Joerg
>From 153e8f6cf39c42dd9767eb49a27eacfb69738fb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joerg Roedel
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:33:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86: irq: Check for valid irq descr
3 matches
Mail list logo