Re: [PATCH] x86: eliminate irq_mis_count counted in arch_irq_stat

* Li, Fei wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Chuansheng > > > Signed-off-by: Li Fei > > > > The patch looks good, but this is not a valid signoff sequence. If Liu > > Chuansheng wrote this patch then his From: line should be included. If he > > acked it, then it should be added as Acked-by. > >

RE: [PATCH] x86: eliminate irq_mis_count counted in arch_irq_stat

> > Signed-off-by: Liu Chuansheng > > Signed-off-by: Li Fei > > The patch looks good, but this is not a valid signoff sequence. If Liu > Chuansheng wrote this patch then his From: line should be included. If he > acked it, then it should be added as Acked-by. > Hello Ingo, Thanks for your qu

Re: [PATCH] x86: eliminate irq_mis_count counted in arch_irq_stat

* Li Fei wrote: > > With current implementation, kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs_sum is also > increased in case of irq_mis_count increment. > So there is no need to count irq_mis_count in arch_irq_stat, > otherwise irq_mis_count will be counted twice in the sum of > /proc/stat. > > Signed-off-by: Liu Chu

[PATCH] x86: eliminate irq_mis_count counted in arch_irq_stat

With current implementation, kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs_sum is also increased in case of irq_mis_count increment. So there is no need to count irq_mis_count in arch_irq_stat, otherwise irq_mis_count will be counted twice in the sum of /proc/stat. Signed-off-by: Liu Chuansheng Signed-off-by: Li Fei ---