Re: [PATCH] x86: bump default NR_CPUS for 64-bit configuration

2015-05-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > Default NR_CPUS==8 is not enough to cover high-end desktop > > configuration: Haswell-E has upto 16 threads. > > > > Let's increase default NR_CPUS to 64 on 64-bit configuration. With this > > value CPU bitmas

Re: [PATCH] x86: bump default NR_CPUS for 64-bit configuration

2015-05-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Default NR_CPUS==8 is not enough to cover high-end desktop > configuration: Haswell-E has upto 16 threads. > > Let's increase default NR_CPUS to 64 on 64-bit configuration. With this > value CPU bitmask will still fit into one unsinged lo

[PATCH] x86: bump default NR_CPUS for 64-bit configuration

2015-05-08 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
Default NR_CPUS==8 is not enough to cover high-end desktop configuration: Haswell-E has upto 16 threads. Let's increase default NR_CPUS to 64 on 64-bit configuration. With this value CPU bitmask will still fit into one unsinged long. Default for 32-bit configuration is still 8: it's unlikely anyb