Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove pt_regs arg from smp_thermal_interrupt

On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 05:01:53PM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote: > The pt_regs arg is never used, make it agree with the other > definitions of smp_thermal_interrupt. They are all completely independent. > > It doesn't look like smp_thermal_interrupt is even called on > 32-bit... It is called f

Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove pt_regs arg from smp_thermal_interrupt

The pt_regs arg is never used, make it agree with the other definitions of smp_thermal_interrupt. It doesn't look like smp_thermal_interrupt is even called on 32-bit... Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- How about I actually send the patch that worked this time? Sorry about th

[PATCH] x86: Remove pt_regs arg from smp_thermal_interrupt

The pt_regs arg is never used, make it agree with the other definitions of smp_thermal_interrupt. It doesn't look like smp_thermal_interrupt is even called on 32-bit... Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Andrew, this is a fairly dumb patch, but works-for-me(tm) arch/x86/kern