On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 11:20:07PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> I am not an expert in linux patch process but I think that as Kirill
> wrote the patch, he should be the author of the patch and me I should
> be in the "Reported-by" tag, isn't it ?
It sounds to me like he doesn't care all that muc
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:01:55 +0100
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:19:16PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > I don't know why gcc raises a warning on that even if it is not used.
> > Anyway, I'm sure that the warning is reproducible. Both of your
> > solutions fix the issue.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:19:16PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> I don't know why gcc raises a warning on that even if it is not used.
> Anyway, I'm sure that the warning is reproducible. Both of your
> solutions fix the issue.
I still see the warning here. You wanna choose one solution, write a
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:52:50 +0300
"Kirill A. Shutemov" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:25:37PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:50:11 +0300
> > "Kirill A. Shutemov" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:38:33PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > > > When CONFI
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:25:37PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:50:11 +0300
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:38:33PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > > When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
> > > stub. In such
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:50:11 +0300
"Kirill A. Shutemov" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:38:33PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
> > stub. In such case, vma is unused and a compiler raises a warning:
> >
> > arch/x86/kern
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 09:33:05 +0100
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:38:33PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
> > stub. In such case, vma is unused and a compiler raises a warning:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/vm
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:50:11PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:38:33PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
> > stub. In such case, vma is unused and a compiler raises a warning:
> >
> > arch/x86/
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:38:33PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
> stub. In such case, vma is unused and a compiler raises a warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c: In function ‘mark_screen_rdonly’:
> arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:38:33PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
> stub. In such case, vma is unused and a compiler raises a warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c: In function ‘mark_screen_rdonly’:
> arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.
When CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, split_huge_pmd is a no-op
stub. In such case, vma is unused and a compiler raises a warning:
arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c: In function ‘mark_screen_rdonly’:
arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c:180:26: warning: unused variable ‘vma’
[-Wunused-variable]
struct vm_
11 matches
Mail list logo
