On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 10:47:00PM -0800, Christian Kujau wrote:
> If so, would simly removing it do the trick or is there more magic
> involved? I don't have that many cross-compilers though and it's not even
> build-tested:
There are cross compilers here:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/cros
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> Looks like it's not used in several arches
>
> $ git grep -w __addr_ok
> arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h:#define __addr_ok(addr)
> ((void)(addr), 1)
> arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h:#define __addr_ok(addr) (access_ok(addr, 0))
> arch/openrisc/inc
On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 20:42 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:20:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:11 AM Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > This was caught while staring at the whole {set,get}_fs() machinery.
> >
> > Heh.
> >
> > You should proba
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:20:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:11 AM Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > This was caught while staring at the whole {set,get}_fs() machinery.
>
> Heh.
>
> You should probably have researched _when_ it became unused.
>
> That seems to have
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:11 AM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> This was caught while staring at the whole {set,get}_fs() machinery.
Heh.
You should probably have researched _when_ it became unused.
That seems to have happened in commit 5723aa993d83 ("x86: use the new
generic strnlen_user() functio
From: Borislav Petkov
This was caught while staring at the whole {set,get}_fs() machinery.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Andy Lutomirski
Cc: Jann Horn
Cc: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding"
---
arch/x86/inclu
6 matches
Mail list logo
