Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-12-01 Thread Tom Lendacky
On 12/1/20 8:44 AM, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 16:36, Tom Lendacky wrote: >> >> Thomas has reported this to me previously and I have reported it to our >> BIOS team. That previously reported problem has been fixed in BIOS, but >> I'm not sure at what AGESA level the fix will

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-12-01 Thread Laurențiu Nicola
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 16:36, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > Thomas has reported this to me previously and I have reported it to our > BIOS team. That previously reported problem has been fixed in BIOS, but > I'm not sure at what AGESA level the fix will be rolled out. > > @Laurențiu, what is the exact

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-12-01 Thread Tom Lendacky
On 11/30/20 5:34 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30 2020 at 19:22, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, at 18:56, Thomas Gleixner wrote: That's right, sorry. It still boots, but it's no longer "quiet", that's what I meant. >>> >>> Right, but surpressing that is not a

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-12-01 Thread Laurențiu Nicola
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 12:38, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01 2020 at 10:18, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 01:34, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> Just for completeness sake. Can you provide the line in /proc/interrupts > >> for irq 7 on that machine? > > > > > > 55:

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-12-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, Dec 01 2020 at 10:18, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 01:34, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Just for completeness sake. Can you provide the line in /proc/interrupts >> for irq 7 on that machine? > > > 55: 0 0 0 0 0 0

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-12-01 Thread Laurențiu Nicola
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 01:34, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The point is that for some cases this can result in a non working > machine which just hangs and if it's below the usual loglevel cutoff, > then it's not visible, which is more annoying than a non-quiet boot if > you're affected. For most (de

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-11-30 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, Nov 30 2020 at 19:22, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, at 18:56, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > That's right, sorry. It still boots, but it's no longer "quiet", >> > that's what I meant. >> >> Right, but surpressing that is not a solution. > > I'm just downgrading it from "emer

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-11-30 Thread Laurențiu Nicola
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, at 18:56, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Laurentiu, > > On Fri, Nov 27 2020 at 10:03, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020, at 02:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 26 2020 at 09:47, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > >> > These messages are described as warnings in

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-11-30 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Laurentiu, On Fri, Nov 27 2020 at 10:03, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020, at 02:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 26 2020 at 09:47, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: >> > These messages are described as warnings in the MSI code. >> >> Where and what has MSI to do with these messages?

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-11-27 Thread Laurențiu Nicola
Hello, On Fri, Nov 27, 2020, at 02:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26 2020 at 09:47, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > > These messages are described as warnings in the MSI code. > > Where and what has MSI to do with these messages? There's a comment referring to it as a warning, but an error s

Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity

2020-11-26 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, Nov 26 2020 at 09:47, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > These messages are described as warnings in the MSI code. Where and what has MSI to do with these messages? > Spotted because they break quiet boot on a Ryzen 5000 CPU. They don't break the boot. The machine boots fine, but having interrup