Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_idle: add GLK support

2017-05-04 Thread Jacob Pan
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:36:42 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > From: "Box, David E" > > > > Gemini Lake uses the same C-states as Broxton and also uses the > > IRTL MSR's to determine maximum C-state latency. > > > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box > > You could use the code names consisten

Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_idle: add GLK support

2017-04-28 Thread Len Brown
Acked-by: Len Brown On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 2:06 AM, David E. Box wrote: > From: "Box, David E" > > Gemini Lake uses the same C-states as Broxton and also uses the > IRTL MSR's to determine maximum C-state latency. > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box > --- > drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 2 ++ > 1

Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_idle: add GLK support

2017-04-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:06:25 PM David E. Box wrote: > From: "Box, David E" > > Gemini Lake uses the same C-states as Broxton and also uses the > IRTL MSR's to determine maximum C-state latency. > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box You could use the code names consistently in your subjects (

[PATCH] x86/intel_idle: add GLK support

2017-04-22 Thread David E. Box
From: "Box, David E" Gemini Lake uses the same C-states as Broxton and also uses the IRTL MSR's to determine maximum C-state latency. Signed-off-by: David E. Box --- drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_i