Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Setup separate EFI page tables in kexec paths

2016-01-25 Thread Matt Fleming
On Thu, 21 Jan, at 08:58:15PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > > Ingo, this commit should unblock the EFI changes for v4.5. Looks like all this material missed v4.5. Was that intentional?

Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Setup separate EFI page tables in kexec paths

2016-01-21 Thread Matt Fleming
On Fri, 22 Jan, at 01:03:32AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > * Matt Fleming [2016-01-21 14:11:59]: > > > The switch to using a new dedicated page table for EFI runtime calls > > in commit commit 67a9108ed431 ("x86/efi: Build our own page table > > structures") failed to take into account changes req

Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Setup separate EFI page tables in kexec paths

2016-01-21 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
* Matt Fleming [2016-01-21 14:11:59]: > The switch to using a new dedicated page table for EFI runtime calls > in commit commit 67a9108ed431 ("x86/efi: Build our own page table > structures") failed to take into account changes required for the > kexec code paths, which are unfortunately duplicat

[PATCH] x86/efi: Setup separate EFI page tables in kexec paths

2016-01-21 Thread Matt Fleming
The switch to using a new dedicated page table for EFI runtime calls in commit commit 67a9108ed431 ("x86/efi: Build our own page table structures") failed to take into account changes required for the kexec code paths, which are unfortunately duplicated in the EFI code. Call the allocation and set