On 02/20/2014 09:50 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 02/20/2014 08:11 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello, Lai.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:47:58AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> If a worker is wokenup unexpectedly, it will start to work incorretly.
>>> Although it hardly happen, we should catch it an
On 02/20/2014 08:11 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Lai.
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:47:58AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> If a worker is wokenup unexpectedly, it will start to work incorretly.
>> Although it hardly happen, we should catch it and wait for being started
>> if it does happen.
>
>
Hello, Lai.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:47:58AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> If a worker is wokenup unexpectedly, it will start to work incorretly.
> Although it hardly happen, we should catch it and wait for being started
> if it does happen.
Can this actually happen? If so, how?
> Signed-off-
If a worker is wokenup unexpectedly, it will start to work incorretly.
Although it hardly happen, we should catch it and wait for being started
if it does happen.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
---
kernel/workqueue.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ker
4 matches
Mail list logo