On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 08:26 +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Joe Perches
> > Because gcc issues a complaint about any pointer format with %#p,
> > remove the use of SPECIAL to prefix 0x to various pointer types.
> >
> > There are no uses in the kernel tree of %#p.
>
> I know you guys don't real
From: Joe Perches
> Because gcc issues a complaint about any pointer format with %#p,
> remove the use of SPECIAL to prefix 0x to various pointer types.
>
> There are no uses in the kernel tree of %#p.
I know you guys don't really care about them, but there might
be uses in out of tree drivers.
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 12:44 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > Because gcc issues a complaint about any pointer format with %#p,
> > remove the use of SPECIAL to prefix 0x to various pointer types.
[]
> Conceptually good, thanks for your effort, but you
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> Because gcc issues a complaint about any pointer format with %#p,
> remove the use of SPECIAL to prefix 0x to various pointer types.
>
> There are no uses in the kernel tree of %#p.
>
> This removes the capability added by commit 725fe002d315
> ("vsprintf
Because gcc issues a complaint about any pointer format with %#p,
remove the use of SPECIAL to prefix 0x to various pointer types.
There are no uses in the kernel tree of %#p.
This removes the capability added by commit 725fe002d315
("vsprintf: correctly handle width when '#' flag used in %#p for
5 matches
Mail list logo