On Monday, March 20, 2017 11:42:56 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Bartlomiej,
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 06:19:17PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 01, 2017 05:31:01 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, devices can be unbound from the
>
Hi Bartlomiej,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 06:19:17PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 01, 2017 05:31:01 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, devices can be unbound from the
> > driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
>
On Wednesday, March 01, 2017 05:31:01 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, devices can be unbound from the
> driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
> remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
> platform_driver_probe() which s
Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, devices can be unbound from the
driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
platform_driver_probe() which specifically disables sysfs bind/unbind
attributes.
Signed-off-by: Dmitr
4 matches
Mail list logo