On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 14:12 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Well, at some point when I was doing vfio it seemed like a good idea and
> I copied it from another driver.
For some time now I have this idea that there's a Linux kernel module
template somewhere that uses defines like the ones you're us
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 20:32 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 11:27 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/virqfd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/virqfd.c
>
> > +#define DRIVER_VERSION "0.1"
> > +#define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Alex Williamson "
> > +#define DRIVER_DESC "IRQFD
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 11:27 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> --- a/drivers/vfio/virqfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/virqfd.c
> +#define DRIVER_VERSION "0.1"
> +#define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Alex Williamson "
> +#define DRIVER_DESC "IRQFD support for VFIO bus drivers"
> +MODULE_VERSION(DRIVER_VERSION);
>
An unintended consequence of commit 42ac9bd18d4f ("vfio: initialize
the virqfd workqueue in VFIO generic code") is that the vfio module
is renamed to vfio_core so that it can include both vfio and virqfd.
That's a user visible change that may break module loading scritps
and it imposes eventfd supp
4 matches
Mail list logo
