*ping*
Is anyone still reading this or should I resubmit? Sorry for being
annoying, just please let me know if this is already considered to get
picked up at the next opportunity or if you've intentionally decided
against it for now. I want to make sure it didn't fall through the
cracks somewhere.
*bump*
Hi Sarah, is there anything else that needs to be resolved to pick
this patch up? Looks like Matthias' recent LPM fixes are all in now so
there should be no way this could cause any trouble?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
> From: jwer...@google.com [mailto:jwer...@google.com] On Behalf Of Julius
> Werner
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:07 AM
>
> > If you take a look at Table
> > 13: BESL/HIRD Encoding from the xHCI spec version including errata to
> > 08/14/2012
>
> Could you please provide a link to that er
> From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:42 AM
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:15:34PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 2:52 PM
> > >
> > > On Mon
> If you take a look at Table
> 13: BESL/HIRD Encoding from the xHCI spec version including errata to
> 08/14/2012
Could you please provide a link to that errata? I still cannot find
it... but from your explanation, that design decision sounds pretty
horrible. Why didn't they just choose not to se
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:15:34PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 2:52 PM
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:37:56PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sh...@linux.in
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:08:12PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote:
> > So the 2.41a has BESL support, but may not set the BLC flag. What
> > happens if we use the HIRD encoding instead? Will things break? It
> > seems like we would need to disable USB 2.0 LPM on that host all
> > together, if it exp
> So the 2.41a has BESL support, but may not set the BLC flag. What
> happens if we use the HIRD encoding instead? Will things break? It
> seems like we would need to disable USB 2.0 LPM on that host all
> together, if it expects BESL encoding, but advertises HIRD encoding.
Wait a second, just
> From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 2:52 PM
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:37:56PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:14 PM
> > >
> > > On Thu,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:37:56PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:14 PM
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:11:49AM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > From: Julius Werner
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, Augus
> From: Paul Zimmerman
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:38 PM
...
> So it may be safer to say that the feature is present starting with 2.50a.
>
> In 2.51a it has been well-tested in simulation. In actual hardware, it
That should have said:
"In 2.50a it has been well-tested in simulation..."
> From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:14 PM
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:11:49AM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > From: Julius Werner
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:22 PM
> > >
> > > > You need the USB 2.0 spec errata from 2011-
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:11:49AM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Julius Werner
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:22 PM
> >
> > > You need the USB 2.0 spec errata from 2011-11 that describes the changes
> > > made for BESL as well. It's in the USB2-LPM-Errata-final.pdf and
> > > USB2
> From: Julius Werner
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:22 PM
>
> > You need the USB 2.0 spec errata from 2011-11 that describes the changes
> > made for BESL as well. It's in the USB2-LPM-Errata-final.pdf and
> > USB2_LinkPowerMangement_ECN[final].pdf files in this zip file:
> >
> > http://ww
> You need the USB 2.0 spec errata from 2011-11 that describes the changes
> made for BESL as well. It's in the USB2-LPM-Errata-final.pdf and
> USB2_LinkPowerMangement_ECN[final].pdf files in this zip file:
>
> http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/usb_20_070113.zip
>
> I agree though, it's all a con
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:45:14PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:43:55PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote:
> > > Thanks for the patch! Did you test with a USB analyzer to see if the
> > > device was actually going into USB 2.0 Link PM? I'd like to confirm we
> > > really aren't
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:43:55PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch! Did you test with a USB analyzer to see if the
> > device was actually going into USB 2.0 Link PM? I'd like to confirm we
> > really aren't breaking anything for DW3 hosts by enabling this.
>
> Yes, I did. T
> Thanks for the patch! Did you test with a USB analyzer to see if the
> device was actually going into USB 2.0 Link PM? I'd like to confirm we
> really aren't breaking anything for DW3 hosts by enabling this.
Yes, I did. The LPM transfers on the analyzer look good and the device
works as expect
Hi Julius,
Thanks for the patch! Did you test with a USB analyzer to see if the
device was actually going into USB 2.0 Link PM? I'd like to confirm we
really aren't breaking anything for DW3 hosts by enabling this.
Sarah Sharp
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:21:49PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote:
> Th
The driver methods required for hardware LPM have only been added to the
PCI version of the XHCI driver, for no apparent reason. They seem to
work just as well with the platform driver, so let's add them to give
more devices the chance for additional power savings. Tested on the DWC3
xHC of an Exyn
20 matches
Mail list logo
