tree. I don't remember there is a reasonable excuse to reject this
> patch.
>
> So, anyone like to pick it up?
>
> --
> From 6ae1b9e71f9b14be5774ae9c1b4cf57cd4e747ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Shi
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:18 +0800
>
gt;> patch.
> >>
> >> So, anyone like to pick it up?
> >
> > Ping ...
>
> Is there someone like to give a bit comments on this patch?
> >>
> >> --
> >> From 6ae1b9e71f9b14be5774ae9c1b4cf57cd4e747ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
gt; So, anyone like to pick it up?
>
> Ping ...
Is there someone like to give a bit comments on this patch?
>>
>> --
>> From 6ae1b9e71f9b14be5774ae9c1b4cf57cd4e747ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Shi
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:18 +0800
>>
...
>
> --
> From 6ae1b9e71f9b14be5774ae9c1b4cf57cd4e747ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Shi
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:18 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] usb/xhci: unify parameter of xhci_msi_irq
>
> According to Felipe and Alan's comments the second parameter of irq
> handler sh
ate: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] usb/xhci: unify parameter of xhci_msi_irq
According to Felipe and Alan's comments the second parameter of irq
handler should be 'void *' not a specific structure pointer.
So change it.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi
On 08/26/2012 10:01 AM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:59:00PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> On 06/12/2012 05:14 AM, gregkh wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:47:09PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
Hi Alex,
This got lost in the 3.5 push, but I think it's a good candida
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:59:00PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 05:14 AM, gregkh wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:47:09PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> >> Hi Alex,
> >>
> >> This got lost in the 3.5 push, but I think it's a good candidate for
> >> 3.6. I think Greg is accepting 3.6
On 06/12/2012 05:14 AM, gregkh wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:47:09PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> This got lost in the 3.5 push, but I think it's a good candidate for
>> 3.6. I think Greg is accepting 3.6 patches now, and I'll send this off
>> to him.
>
> Yes, I am taking 3.
8 matches
Mail list logo